Glycemic variability in diagnosis of gestational diabetes as predictor of pharmacological treatment.

INTRODUCTION: To establish whether glycemic variability (GV) parameters used when gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been diagnosed could help predict the probability that a patient will need pharmacological treatment, and to analyze the link of these parameters to the development of maternal-fetal complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 87 women with GDM who underwent retrospective continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for six days between weeks 26 and 32 of gestation, following diagnosis. The mean glycemia levels and GV variables were analyzed together with their link to maternal-fetal complications, and the need for pharmacological treatment. ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves were developed to determine validity to detect the need for pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: Patients with higher mean glycemia (p < 0.001) and continuous overlapping of net glycemic action in a period of n-hours (CONGAn) (p = 0.001) required pharmacological treatment. The ROC curves showed cut-off points of 98.81 mg/dL for mean glycemia, and 86.70 mg/dL for CONGAn, with 83.3% sensitivity and 67.8% specificity for both parameters. No relation between the GV parameters and development of maternal-fetal complications was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CGM, once GDM is diagnosed, enables us to identify those patients who would benefit from closer monitoring during gestation, and facilitate a speedier take-up of pharmacological treatment. However, prospective studies involving a higher number of patients are needed, as well as a cost assessment for recommending the use of CGM following GDM diagnosis.

Real-world evidence of off-label use of commercially automated insulin delivery systems compared to multiple daily insulin injections in pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: To compare glycemic control and maternal-fetal outcomes of women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using hybrid closed loop (HCL) vs. multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) plus continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). METHODS: Multicenter prospective cohort study of pregnant women with T1D in Spain. We evaluated HbA1c and time spent within (TIR), below (TBR) and above (TAR) the pregnancy-specific glucose range 3.5-7.8 mmol/L. Adjusted models were performed for adverse pregnancy outcomes including baseline maternal characteristics and center. RESULTS: 112 women were included (HCL n=59). Women in the HCL group had a longer duration of diabetes and higher rates of prepregnancy care. There were no between-group differences in HbA1c in any trimester. However, in the second trimester, MDI users had a greater decrease in HbA1c (-6.12±9.06 vs. -2.16 ±7.42 mmol/mol, p=0.031). No differences in TIR (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) and TAR were observed between HCL and MDI users, but with a higher total insulin dose in the second trimester (+0.13 IU/Kg/d). HCL therapy was associated with increased maternal weight gain during pregnancy (ßadjusted 3.20 kg, 95%CI 0.90-5.50). Regarding neonatal outcomes, newborns of HCL users were more likely to have higher birthweight (ßadjusted 279.0 g, 95% CI 39.5-518.5) and macrosomia (ORadjusted 3.18, 95% CI 1.05-9.67) compared to MDI users. These associations disappeared when maternal weight gain or third trimester HbA1c were included in the models. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, HCL users gained more weight during pregnancy and had larger newborns than MDI users, while achieving similar glycemic control in terms of HbA1c and TIR.

Executive summary: Position document: Evaluation and management of hypoglycemia in the patient with diabetes mellitus 2020. Diabetes Mellitus Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition.

OBJECTIVE: To provide practical recommendations for the evaluation and management of hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Diabetes Mellitus Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN). METHODS: The recommendations were made based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to establish both the strength of the recommendations and the level of evidence. A systematic search was made in MEDLINE (PubMed) for the available evidence on each subject, and articles written in English and Spanish with an inclusion date up to 30 November 2019 were reviewed. This executive summary takes account of the evidence incorporated since 2013. CONCLUSIONS: The document establishes practical evidence-based recommendations regarding the evaluation and management of hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Executive summary: Position document: Evaluation and management of hypoglycemia in the patient with diabetes mellitus 2020. Diabetes Mellitus Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition. / Resumen ejecutivo: Documento de posicionamiento: evaluación y manejo de la hipoglucemia en el paciente con diabetes mellitus 2020. Grupo de Trabajo de Diabetes Mellitus de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición.

OBJECTIVE: To provide practical recommendations for the evaluation and management of hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Diabetes Mellitus Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN). METHODS: The recommendations were made based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to establish both the strength of the recommendations and the level of evidence. A systematic search was made in MEDLINE (PubMed) for the available evidence on each subject, and articles written in English and Spanish with an inclusion date up to 28 February 2020 were reviewed. This executive summary takes account of the evidence incorporated since 2013. CONCLUSIONS: The document establishes practical evidence-based recommendations regarding the evaluation and management of hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Patterns in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) could detect certain patterns of hyperglycemia at different times of the day that may help predict the development of maternal-fetal complications and the probability of needing pharmacological treatment. Methods: This study prospectively examined 77 women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who were placed on a CGM system for 6 days after diagnosis between 26 and 32 weeks of gestation. Patterns of hyperglycemia before meals (period of time of an hour just before meal) (>95 mg/dL), after meals (time interval of 2 h and half just after meal) (>140 mg/dL), and overnight (0-7 am) (>120 mg/dL) and their association with maternal-fetal complications and pharmacological treatment were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were developed to estimate the validity of the various patterns in detecting the need for pharmacological treatment. Results: A statistically significant relationship was observed between time in hyperglycemia after lunch and macrosomia (P = 0.035) and large for gestational age infants (P = 0.010). Pharmacological treatment was required for patients with time above range (TAR; P = 0.006) and those with hyperglycemia patterns before breakfast (P < 0.001), after breakfast (P = 0.006), before dinner (P = 0.012), and overnight (P = 0.001). Every additional percentage point of TAR was associated with a 24% increase in the probability of pharmacological treatment. Conclusions: The use of CGM for the diagnosis of GDM allows the identification of those patients who would benefit from closer monitoring during pregnancy, including self-monitoring of both pre- and postprandial blood glucose levels, facilitating the initiation of early pharmacological treatment.